‘Moral Ambition: Stop Wasting Your Talent and Start Making a Difference’ by Rutger Bregman
Rutger Bregman’s latest book “makes profound change look easy,” said Isabel Berwick in Financial Times. The Dutch author of the best-seller Humankind: A Hopeful History has set his sights on today’s educated elite, urging each of his readers to reject the allure of high-paying but damaging or pointless careers and choose instead to devote their careers to doing good for the world. While the suggestion may sound unrealistic, “there’s a playbook here,” as Bregman shares stories about the successes achieved when individual idealists have banded together in teams, such as the army of young lawyers Ralph Nader assembled in the 1960s and ’70s to rewrite U.S. environmental and consumer protection law. The great challenges of our own time are many, and Bregman’s “brisk and persuasive” argument stands a chance of waking many readers to the role they can play in meeting them.
His opening idea “may sound like a promising point of departure,” said Helmer Stoel in Jacobin. He puts people into four categories: those who are neither idealistic nor ambitious, those who are ambitious but unidealistic, those who are idealistic but unambitious, and those who get the mix right. Sure, few of us want to fall into any of the first three categories. The first group, in his moral cosmos, winds up in “bullshit jobs,” and he dismisses the sorry third cohort as “noble losers.” But Bregman is so focused on coaching readers how to find individual satisfaction that he makes the heroic individual efforts to do good more important than the righteousness of any collective cause. “It is not clear what the ‘good’ is that needs doing.”
Still, “the stories that Bregman tells are vivid and often genuinely inspiring,” said Rowan Williams in The Guardian. He writes of a young Cambridge University graduate deciding in 1785 at age 24 to commit his life to ending slavery worldwide—and largely succeeding. He writes about Dutch and French families who sheltered their Jewish neighbors during the Nazi occupation, and of the strategic thinking that made the 1955 Montgomery, Ala., bus boycott so effective. Beyond all that, he also acknowledges his heroes’ errors, such as when a messianic streak led Nader to stay in the 2000 presidential election even though that choice put a free-market Republican in the White House. Should you remain skeptical, maybe Bregman will turn you around at the end of the book, when he argues that doubting that an individual can make a difference is essentially egotistical because doing so rejects how interwoven one’s actions are with those of all other humans. “Oversimplified? Perhaps. But calls to arms often have to be.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week’s Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
‘Is a River Alive?’ by Robert Macfarlane
“Robert Macfarlane is the most engaging of British writers,” said Pico Iyer in Air Mail. The 48-year-old nature writer and Cambridge University professor produces prose “as dense as a forest but flooded with sunlight.” And “savingly,” he also has a sense of humor. In his new book, the tireless explorer shares his journeys to three threatened river systems—in the cloud forests of Ecuador, in southernmost India, and in northeastern Canada—each time cataloging what the rivers give to humans and what humans give back. Despite all the damage he sees, he “tenaciously assembles a history, and a geography, of hope,” showing that the ancient idea of rivers as living entities is again taking hold, changing law and politics in countries scattered across the globe.
Macfarlane decides to refer to each river as a “who,” not an “it,” and that’s “jarring at first,” said Clea Simon in The Boston Globe. But you adjust to it, helped by the many quoted Indigenous sources who do the same. The book proves to be “a compelling, if occasionally maddening, read, veering from gorgeous, almost hallucinatory writing into overeffusiveness.” Still, as Macfarlane weaves in the stories of activists and the beliefs of far-flung river cultures, he succeeds in “building a foundation for his case that is both deep and broad.” And as dense as the book can be, it is also “a profoundly beautiful and moving work.”
Alas, “the sentimentality of the writing reflects a certain sentimentality of thought,” said Becca Rothfeld in The Washington Post. Macfarlane never tells us what he means by calling a river a living thing. “Surely not everything dynamic is alive,” and “just as surely, something does not need to be alive to be worthy of reverence.” To insist on calling a river alive is to cram it into a human category when “it is the very strangeness of rivers and mountains and other inanimate solidities that moves and compels us.” But the book’s mission isn’t to win a logical argument, said Mark Dery in 4Columns. “Running like a cross-current beneath Macfarlane’s passionate, activist storytelling is a bracingly new approach to nature writing.” Urging us to unplug from rationalism and embrace animism, “he dreams of nothing less than the re-enchantment of the world.”
